The wind in the genetic debate is turning
Politics and business are increasingly opening up to new breeding methods such as genome editing. Until recently, this would have been unthinkable. The change of opinion has to do with the voices from science, which are now slowly becoming heard. Even exponents of the Greens are no longer categorically opposed to the debate on new breeding technologies.
Monday, February 28, 2022
The genetic moratorium has been a sacred cow in Switzerland since the 2005 referendum. It has already been extended four times. Serious debates on new breeding technologies and advances in plant genetics have not yet taken place. Regardless of the opportunities offered by new breeding technologies, "GM-free" food continued to be elevated to the status of a quality feature of Swiss agriculture. But as the St. Galler Tagblatt writes, a change of heart is currently taking place in politics.
Opportunities instead of risks
Instead of just talking about risks and dangers, the chances of new methods of plant breeding are suddenly also being discussed. This is mainly thanks to researchers. In contrast to the past years, the voice of science is getting louder. And it is being heard. From a scientific point of view, the GM moratorium cannot be maintained. The Nobel-winning gene shears CRISPR/Cas9 offer the possibility of growing more profitable, pest- and disease-resistant plants within a useful period of time. Against the background of climate change, these are decisive advantages over the existing breeding methods, which require significantly more time for the breeding of a new variety.
Farmers are coming around
Farmers also recognize that research has provided important impetus. "Research can make an important contribution, especially in the development of more resistant plants," says Markus Ritter, president of the Swiss farmers' Association in the St. Galler Tagblatt. Farmers' openness to genome editing probably also has to do with the fact that climate change is forcing them to innovate. At the same time, it is an opportunity for them to operate more sustainably and to use fewer plant protection products. Christian Wasserfallen from the FDP argues along the same lines: "If we want to reduce the use of plant protection products and water consumption, we need these new technologies."
Overcoming dogmas
And Jürg Grossen from the GLP also wants to overcome old dogmas. The two agricultural initiatives of the summer of 2021 had made people aware of what farmers are struggling with. Genome editing offers the opportunity for more sustainable agriculture. Even the lady, Maya Graf (Green Party), who has become known for her commitment to the genetic moratorium, leaves the door open for debate: "I am not one who categorically fights for the moratorium until the last breath," she says in the St. Galler Tagblatt. And thus confirms the change in the discourse on new breeding technologies.
Related articles
Sales bans due to PFAS: Should we be worried?
After spectacular sales bans on fish and meat due to PFAS contamination, consumers are asking themselves: How dangerous are these substances really – and what can still be placed in the shopping basket without concern?
How German Experts View New Breeding Techniques
In hardly any other country is the idyllic image of organic farming cultivated in the public sphere as carefully as in Germany. Naturalness and rural authenticity are powerful mental refuges for many Germans. Against this backdrop, it is hardly surprising that resistance to new breeding techniques is strong – and that ignorance about the realities of organic farming sometimes appears almost deliberate.
Why consumers accept gene-edited foods on their plates
Acceptance of gene-edited foods increases when the tangible benefits for consumers are easy to understand. A recent study by the Center for Food Integrity (CFI), conducted in collaboration with FMI – The Food Industry Association, shows that consumers evaluate technologies such as genome editing positively when they recognize clear advantages for health, the environment, or food security.
Beautiful and delicious mutants on your plate: The misunderstood world of crop improvement
When most of us hear the word mutation, the images that come to mind are not positive. We think of radioactive monsters, comic book villains, or genetic diseases like sickle-cell anemia. In popular culture, “mutants” are often synonymous with danger. Possibly the most famous are Marvel’s X-Men, who have enjoyed four big-screen incarnations and an enduring place among sci-fi movie aficionados.