The wind in the genetic debate is turning

The wind in the genetic debate is turning

Politics and business are increasingly opening up to new breeding methods such as genome editing. Until recently, this would have been unthinkable. The change of opinion has to do with the voices from science, which are now slowly becoming heard. Even exponents of the Greens are no longer categorically opposed to the debate on new breeding technologies.

Monday, February 28, 2022

The genetic moratorium has been a sacred cow in Switzerland since the 2005 referendum. It has already been extended four times. Serious debates on new breeding technologies and advances in plant genetics have not yet taken place. Regardless of the opportunities offered by new breeding technologies, "GM-free" food continued to be elevated to the status of a quality feature of Swiss agriculture. But as the St. Galler Tagblatt writes, a change of heart is currently taking place in politics.


Opportunities instead of risks

Instead of just talking about risks and dangers, the chances of new methods of plant breeding are suddenly also being discussed. This is mainly thanks to researchers. In contrast to the past years, the voice of science is getting louder. And it is being heard. From a scientific point of view, the GM moratorium cannot be maintained. The Nobel-winning gene shears CRISPR/Cas9 offer the possibility of growing more profitable, pest- and disease-resistant plants within a useful period of time. Against the background of climate change, these are decisive advantages over the existing breeding methods, which require significantly more time for the breeding of a new variety.


Farmers are coming around

Farmers also recognize that research has provided important impetus. "Research can make an important contribution, especially in the development of more resistant plants," says Markus Ritter, president of the Swiss farmers' Association in the St. Galler Tagblatt. Farmers' openness to genome editing probably also has to do with the fact that climate change is forcing them to innovate. At the same time, it is an opportunity for them to operate more sustainably and to use fewer plant protection products. Christian Wasserfallen from the FDP argues along the same lines: "If we want to reduce the use of plant protection products and water consumption, we need these new technologies."


Overcoming dogmas

And Jürg Grossen from the GLP also wants to overcome old dogmas. The two agricultural initiatives of the summer of 2021 had made people aware of what farmers are struggling with. Genome editing offers the opportunity for more sustainable agriculture. Even the lady, Maya Graf (Green Party), who has become known for her commitment to the genetic moratorium, leaves the door open for debate: "I am not one who categorically fights for the moratorium until the last breath," she says in the St. Galler Tagblatt. And thus confirms the change in the discourse on new breeding technologies.

Related articles

Genetic scissors for the future – soon in Switzerland too?
Media

Genetic scissors for the future – soon in Switzerland too?

Genome editing is seen as a promising way to make agriculture more sustainable and climate-resilient. But Switzerland is hesitant to approve it. A popular initiative even wants to ban it. But what can CRISPR really do?

Less than 50 percent: How Switzerland is squandering its self-sufficiency
Media

Less than 50 percent: How Switzerland is squandering its self-sufficiency

Swiss agriculture is under enormous pressure. Extreme weather conditions, pests and increasingly stringent regulations are putting producers under strain. As a result, self-sufficiency is falling dramatically, especially for plant-based foods. To ensure food security in Switzerland, effective plant protection products are urgently needed.

Only half the truth in the genetic engineering debate
New Breeding Technologies Media

Only half the truth in the genetic engineering debate

Those who only see the risks remain blind to the opportunities offered by a new technology. Opponents of genetic engineering have presented a new survey on new breeding methods, which reveals some telling gaps.

«The FOAG is abandoning productive agriculture»
Media

«The FOAG is abandoning productive agriculture»

Increasing pests, missing tools, growing bureaucracy – the farmers' criticism of the federal government is loud and clear. Swiss agriculture is at its limit, reports Blick. The demand: effective plant protection products are urgently needed again.

More contributions from Media