
Don’t stifle research and innovation
Whether it’s 5G, the coronavirus vaccine or genetic engineering, there is a lot of resistance to new technologies. Are we living in a technophobic era? This question was discussed by publisher Markus Somm and Green Party National Councilor Regula Rytz in the June 13 issue of “SonntagsZeitung” as well as on the “SonntagsZeitung Standpunkte” program.
Thursday, July 8, 2021
Regula Rytz says that Switzerland should not be viewed as hostile to research. She correctly notes that Switzerland took the top spot in the Global Innovation Index. The country is also far advanced in terms of digitalization. This was demonstrated, in particular, during the coronavirus crisis when many people’s daily working life was quickly shifted online. Whether it’s the COVID app, the coronavirus vaccine or blockchain legislation, Switzerland is at the forefront in many areas. At the same time, however, the population must weigh the opportunities and risks of new technologies. According to the Swiss Constitution, the precautionary principle applies when it comes to new technologies. Innovation must be steered in a sustainable direction because, as Rytz notes, “In the 21st century, everything needs to be sustainable.”
Politicians cannot decide which technologies are the “right” ones
Markus Somm views things differently. Technological progress has been politicized since the 1970s. Previously, the market decided whether a new technology was successful. And it was up to future generations to assess whether a technology contributed to the well-being of humanity. Nowadays, politicians increasingly take it on themselves to decide the benefits of a technology in advance. It is determined at the beginning of a technological breakthrough which risks are acceptable and which aren’t. However, research and innovation must be an open process, one that does not focus on the wishes of politicians.
Assessing the consequences of a technology, i.e. the political process to which new technologies are subjected, is now a greater danger than innovation itself, according to Somm. While Switzerland used to be a technology leader, it has now fallen behind in many areas because of regulations and prohibitions. High regulatory hurdles also prevent start-ups from being able to even enter the market. Rather than bashing companies, the important role that large companies play in research and development should be recognized and appreciated. After all, they are the ones who invest money in many areas and drive innovation.
Related articles

The opponents of green genetic engineering lack facts. Their anti-attitude is a dangerous ideology
Switzerland and the EU will decide on the cultivation of plants modified using new breeding technologies in 2025. Authorisation is sensible – and long overdue. After all, genetic engineering is already widespread.

‘There is no such thing as chemical-free food – there never has been and there never will be’
Chemical residues in our food are a hotly debated topic in the media time and again. A glance at Austria shows that it is an illusion to believe that residue-free food production is possible. This is because residues come from both natural and synthetic sources. And the same applies to all of them: it is the quantity that makes the poison.

Why domestic cats threaten biodiversity
A ban on keeping domestic cats is currently being discussed in Scotland. The reason: driven by their hunting instinct, they are able to wipe out entire species of animals. The cat problem is also on the agenda in Switzerland.

Olive oil is becoming a luxury product – and rapeseed is in a tight spot
Olive oil is now so expensive that supermarkets in southern Europe have to chain up their bottles. Poor harvests in Spain and Italy have caused prices to skyrocket. Rapeseed oil could be an alternative – but precisely its cultivation is coming under pressure.