Don’t stifle research and innovation
Whether it’s 5G, the coronavirus vaccine or genetic engineering, there is a lot of resistance to new technologies. Are we living in a technophobic era? This question was discussed by publisher Markus Somm and Green Party National Councilor Regula Rytz in the June 13 issue of “SonntagsZeitung” as well as on the “SonntagsZeitung Standpunkte” program.
Thursday, July 8, 2021
Regula Rytz says that Switzerland should not be viewed as hostile to research. She correctly notes that Switzerland took the top spot in the Global Innovation Index. The country is also far advanced in terms of digitalization. This was demonstrated, in particular, during the coronavirus crisis when many people’s daily working life was quickly shifted online. Whether it’s the COVID app, the coronavirus vaccine or blockchain legislation, Switzerland is at the forefront in many areas. At the same time, however, the population must weigh the opportunities and risks of new technologies. According to the Swiss Constitution, the precautionary principle applies when it comes to new technologies. Innovation must be steered in a sustainable direction because, as Rytz notes, “In the 21st century, everything needs to be sustainable.”
Politicians cannot decide which technologies are the “right” ones
Markus Somm views things differently. Technological progress has been politicized since the 1970s. Previously, the market decided whether a new technology was successful. And it was up to future generations to assess whether a technology contributed to the well-being of humanity. Nowadays, politicians increasingly take it on themselves to decide the benefits of a technology in advance. It is determined at the beginning of a technological breakthrough which risks are acceptable and which aren’t. However, research and innovation must be an open process, one that does not focus on the wishes of politicians.
Assessing the consequences of a technology, i.e. the political process to which new technologies are subjected, is now a greater danger than innovation itself, according to Somm. While Switzerland used to be a technology leader, it has now fallen behind in many areas because of regulations and prohibitions. High regulatory hurdles also prevent start-ups from being able to even enter the market. Rather than bashing companies, the important role that large companies play in research and development should be recognized and appreciated. After all, they are the ones who invest money in many areas and drive innovation.
Related articles
Residue is not the same as residue
Painkillers like Voltaren are a blessing for us – yet in our rivers they can harm fish. If these were crop protection products, calls for bans would be immediate. It becomes clear that we are applying double standards.
ARTE documentary: Genetic engineering in organic farming?
The ARTE documentary “Genetic engineering in organic farming?” examines key controversial questions of modern agriculture: Is the general exclusion of new breeding technologies still up to date? Can the resistance of organic farming be justified scientifically?
The Great Suffering of Farmers
Fire blight, Japanese beetles, or grapevine yellows – farmers in Valais, too, are increasingly feeling helpless in the face of the threats posed by nature. More and more often, they lack the means to effectively protect their crops. This makes it all the more important for the Federal Council to place a pragmatic balancing of interests at the forefront when setting threshold values.
'Tomatoes on your eyes'
The submitted “Food Protection Initiative” calls for “GMO-free food.” Leaving aside this illusory demand, its adoption would mean more bureaucracy, more trade barriers, and less innovation. The Swiss Farmers’ Union describes the proposal as “unnecessary” and warns of a setback to the goal of achieving an even more sustainable agriculture.