“More than 200,000 deaths annually due to pesticide poisoning”

“More than 200,000 deaths annually due to pesticide poisoning”

At rallies and in publications against research-based agricultural companies, there is a persistent claim that more than 200,000 people die from pesticide poisoning every year due to the use of plant protection products. If you look closely, you can see: The number comes from a 35-year-old study. In a thought experiment at the time, suicides involving pesticides in Sri Lanka were extrapolated worldwide.

Monday, February 1, 2021

In brief

  • The number of 200,000 pesticide deaths per year comes from a 1985 document by the occupational health care provider, Jeyarajah Jeyaratnam.
  • It relates to poisoning by pesticides (e.g. rat poison) with suicidal intent and is a global estimate based on data from Sri Lanka.
  • This does not support the claim that the agricultural use of pesticides is responsible for so many deaths.

The outrageous claim cannot be supported at all by the extrapolation of suicide (for example, with rat poison) in Sri Lanka. Nevertheless, the claim by opponents of plant protection products is constantly repeated. Recently, it was again disseminated in the publication “The Poison and Us” published by Bio-Foundation Switzerland. On page 207 it is stated that according to estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), highly toxic pesticides would cause 220,000 deaths each year. And the text goes even further than the claim. Noting that the figures are from 1990, it is literally said that they do “not begin to do justice to the present scale of the problem”. This is, however, complete nonsense, because the basis is already wrong.


The deviation of a number

In fact, the more than 200,000 deaths were mentioned in an official document from 2017by the UN Human Rights Council's Special rapporteur on the right to Food. Critics of crop protection products are happy to refer to this document in their accusations. However, the figure mentioned is not based on own investigations, but is originally from a publication of the occupational health care provider, Jeyarajah Jeyaratnam, in 1985. The number was repeatedly cited over time in various works and studies, although the original text was not always referred to. Thus, the number made it through several detours into the said UN document. The scientific journalist Ludger Wess can prove this in his extremely interesting report.

Investigation of suicides

Jeyaratnam mentions the number associated with poisoning due to suicide attempts. His data are based on medical records from Sri Lanka from 1979. In a thought experiment, he extrapolated the cases globally to clarify the problem. He arrived at the approximate number of 220,000 deaths. This is therefore an estimate of the number of suicide-poisonings with suicidal intent and not of deaths from the use of plant protection products. This fact is often concealed in the case of controversial finger-pointing by pesticide critics.

Blindspot article

Large-scale sustainable food production and healthy eating are complex topics. They need to be viewed from different perspectives. Yet unpopular facts are all too often given short shrift in the public discussion. We illuminate the topics that usually remain in the shadows. This makes it possible for people with conflicting views to engage in a dialogue.

Safe if used correctly

It is clear that pesticides must be handled with care. The alternatives promoted by activists, such as permaculture, homeopathic or even mystical practices for plant strengthening, are unfortunately ineffective against many pests. Good science- and evidence-based cultivation practices, where properly applied crop protection is a tool in the farmers' toolbox, help to combat pests and plant diseases in order to protect crops. Biocides that protect food from herbivores and fungal infections during storage and transport are essential after harvest to guarantee food safety – as are disinfectants. A ban on pesticides – that is, plant protection products and biocides – would have devastating consequences for world food. Famine and food prices would increase sharply. Vast expanses of natural land would have to be converted into arable land. This cannot be the aim of the critics of the agricultural companies.

Related articles

Nutrition: Does the future belong to the green gene scissors?
Knowledge

Nutrition: Does the future belong to the green gene scissors?

New plant varieties contribute to security of supply. The new breeding methods known as "gene scissors", such as Crispr, have the potential to revolutionise agriculture and nutrition.

Regional products are more in demand than ever
Knowledge

Regional products are more in demand than ever

The demand for regional products could hardly be greater. This is shown by a new study by the Zurich School of Business. Consumers even consider regional products to be significantly more sustainable than organic or premium products. To keep up with this trend, it is therefore all the more important to promote modern breeding techniques and plant protection products.

Tomatoes: From «water bomb» to aromatic fruit
Knowledge

Tomatoes: From «water bomb» to aromatic fruit

The diversity of commercially marketed tomato varieties is greater today than ever before. This has to do in particular with the breeding of new varieties.

Public funds for avoidable crop failures: neither sustainable nor resource-efficient
Knowledge

Public funds for avoidable crop failures: neither sustainable nor resource-efficient

The reduced use of plant protection products is causing much smaller wheat and rapeseed harvests. A study carried out by Swiss Agricultural Research reveals that such crop failures can only be offset by state subsidies. This is neither sustainable nor resource-efficient.

More contributions from Knowledge