Combating food waste with packaging and preservatives
The longer food lasts, the less likely it is to be thrown away. Chemical procedures and packaging materials are vital for preserving food. In its online magazine, BASF examines how food preservation techniques have developed and explains the importance of chemicals are in combating food waste. Preservatives are an effective way of combating food waste.
Monday, January 27, 2020
In brief:
- Preserving food products is crucial for avoiding food waste.
- Chemical processes and a variety of packaging solutions play a decisive role here.
- The longer the products remain fresh, the less likely they are to go to waste.
Most foods only keep for a very short time. One of the reasons is bacteria that set the decomposition process in motion. Food then becomes unpalatable and can, in some cases, even be harmful to health. This is why thousands of years ago people developed ways of preserving foods to keep them fresh longer. They discovered that salt, wood smoke, and honey were excellent in protecting food from spoiling. The ancient Egyptians, for example, used honey to preserve their precious seeds as well.
Development of chemicals…
Over time, people developed more and more new procedures to prevent food from spoiling. In modern times, this has also included a variety of chemicals. The 18th century, for example, saw the use of organic carboxylic acids obtained from naturally occurring substances such as formic acid, saltpeter, salt, berries, and coal tar. Food preservatives using nitrates, sulfites, benzoates, and sorbates have been produced on an industrial scale since the late 19th century and are still in use today. Without chemical preservatives it would not be possible to supply consumers with fresh food throughout the year. For example, apples treated with the synthetic plant growth regulator 1-MCP can be stored for up to a year. Synthetically produced preservatives therefore prevent the spoilage of large quantities of food.
... and packaging
The food industry does not rely solely on chemically manufactured substances to keep food fresh for longer, and it also achieves very good results with packaging. In 1951, BASF developed polystyrene under the brand name Styropor®, which proved to be an ideal packaging material for perishable, chilled food products. Food can also be preserved by removing the air from packaging and replacing it with an inert gas mixture. This also slows down the ripening process in fruit. Packaging lengthens the shelf life of food products without the need for synthetically manufactured substances. This appeals particularly to people who want food that remains as natural as possible without the use of additives. The downside is the large quantity of plastic waste. For this reason, there is considerable research into developing organic, biodegradable alternatives. Whether packaging or preservatives, chemical research helps to keep food products fresh longer and to avoid food waste.
Sources
Related articles
Nutrition: Does the future belong to the green gene scissors?
New plant varieties contribute to security of supply. The new breeding methods known as "gene scissors", such as Crispr, have the potential to revolutionise agriculture and nutrition.
Regional products are more in demand than ever
The demand for regional products could hardly be greater. This is shown by a new study by the Zurich School of Business. Consumers even consider regional products to be significantly more sustainable than organic or premium products. To keep up with this trend, it is therefore all the more important to promote modern breeding techniques and plant protection products.
Tomatoes: From «water bomb» to aromatic fruit
The diversity of commercially marketed tomato varieties is greater today than ever before. This has to do in particular with the breeding of new varieties.
Public funds for avoidable crop failures: neither sustainable nor resource-efficient
The reduced use of plant protection products is causing much smaller wheat and rapeseed harvests. A study carried out by Swiss Agricultural Research reveals that such crop failures can only be offset by state subsidies. This is neither sustainable nor resource-efficient.