‘Pesticides are poisoning our food’
Measured residues of plant protection products are often sensationalised in the media. The fact that these residues are well below the levels that could affect our health is usually not mentioned. Equally unmentioned is the fact that pesticides make it possible to produce healthy food for broad sections of the population in the first place and thus contribute significantly to public health.
Tuesday, February 23, 2021
The most important information in brief:
- High safety margins ensure safe consumption.
- Consumers can consume Swiss food from conventional farming without hesitation.
- Many toxic fungi, pathogens and dangerous weeds cannot be controlled without pesticides.
The Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO) publishes the results of official controls for Switzerland and Liechtenstein together. Of the samples reported in 2019, 3140 were analysed for pesticide residues. The 1077 samples from products of Swiss origin showed a rejection rate of 2.7%, which is again lower than in previous years (2018: 3.2%, 2017: 6.5%, 2016: 5.6%, 2015: 6.5%).
High safety margins
It should be noted that the statutory maximum level for consumer health described here is of limited significance in any case. For there to be a specific health risk, the residue of pesticides would have to exceed the maximum permissible level by a factor of around 100. This is because the authorities build in high safety margins. People would have to consume these objectionable foods in huge quantities to actually endanger their health. The same applies to drinking water. To exceed the recommended limits, a person would have to drink a lot.
Blindspot article
Pesticides make food safer
Consumer programmes and magazines also like to ignore the fact that the finding of several different residues in food is not necessarily a bad thing. This may sound paradoxical, but it is easy to explain. Modern pesticides are becoming more and more specific – for example, they may only work against certain groups of pests. As a result, farmers have to use several different active ingredients instead of simply using an old agent to kill everything, including beneficial insects. From an environmental point of view, this is a positive thing. The one-sided focus on residues in food ignores the fact that food is becoming safer for humans precisely because of pesticides, because they, for example, prevent carcinogenic mycotoxins. Without insect repellents and disinfectants – both pesticides – there would be less food safety.
Kindly note:
We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.
We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.
Related articles
"Natural is healthy, chemicals are toxic."
Everything that occurs in nature is healthy and synthetically produced substances, i.e. "chemical" substances, are toxic. This myth is fundamentally wrong: There are many highly toxic substances in nature, and at the same time there are many synthetic substances that are absolutely harmless.
Glyphosate offers many advantages
Glyphosate is the best-studied herbicide in the world. It is mainly used in agriculture to help farmers efficiently and cost-effectively remove unwanted vegetation from fields before sowing.
Five myths about pesticides
The Austrian "Kronen Zeitung" clears up five myths about the use of pesticides in agriculture. With regard to toxicity, what the doctor Paracelsus knew still applies today: The dose makes the poison.
Chasing Misinformation Feels Like Herding Cats
Science fiction has a way of masquerading as science fact — until someone like me comes with a bucket of cold, hard evidence. But let’s be real: debunking nonsense takes exponentially more effort than producing it. Jonathan Swift knew it in 1710, and here I am, centuries later, still speaking my truth before the next viral misinformation dumpster fire.
Climate protection must not jeopardise food security
Agriculture is increasingly under pressure to become climate-neutral. But how can this be achieved without jeopardising food security? In the agricultural policy podcast, Hannah von Ballmoos-Hofer, head of the energy division at the Swiss Farmers' Union, emphasises that climate protection is important, but must not come at the expense of food security.
Tradition and innovation go hand in hand when it comes to food
The study ‘Decoding Food Culture’ by the Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute shows how deeply food culture shapes our lives. That is why it is a balancing act between tradition and innovation to bring about changes in nutrition.
The underestimated danger of plant toxins
Plants produce a variety of chemical substances to protect themselves against predators and diseases, for example. These substances can have a toxic effect in high doses. A recent study by Agroscope highlights the danger of natural substances in Swiss waters.