Scientists urge common sense

Scientists urge common sense

The second swiss-food-talk was attended by three internationally recognised experts from the fields of toxicology, water protection and food safety. They discussed the handling of limit values and the partly wrong interpretation in the public discourse. The scientists pleaded for more objectivity.

Monday, August 31, 2020

Content in German

«We have to distinguish between health-related limits and politically set limits. This is always mixed up», says Rex FitzGerald, Regulatory Toxicologist at the Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT) in Basel. Health-related limits define the dose that has no harmful effect despite lifelong and daily consumption. There are also legal limits that have nothing to do with health risk.

Referat von Dr. Rex FitzGerald, Regulatorischer Toxikologie beim SCAHT.

The value of 0.1 micrograms per litre set for drinking water is not based on a risk assessment, but expresses the political will to have no residues for precautionary reasons. This value is not suitable for assessing the health risk. «If we speak of toxic water because it exceeds 0.1 micrograms per litre, this is fundamentally wrong», says the toxicologist, who carries out risk assessments on behalf of the authorities. He is perplexed as to why this is nevertheless repeatedly reported in the media.

On the right track

Dr Manfred Röttele, project manager of the European water protection initiative TOPPS, explained just how low the limit value for pesticides in water is: «To dilute one gram of an active ingredient to the existing limit value of 0.1 micrograms per litre, you need a stream one metre wide, 30 centimetres deep and 33 kilometres long.» It goes without saying that undesirable inputs into groundwater should be avoided wherever possible. Good agricultural practice is essential. TOPPS supports users and offers the relevant expertise. In this way, pesticide inputs into the groundwater can be significantly reduced. «The direction is right. The contamination of groundwater by pesticides is decreasing», says Röttele.

Referat von Dr. Manfred Röttele, Projektleiter TOPPS.

Discrepancy between perception and danger

Jo Riehle, food chemist and pesticide expert from Hamburg, dares to explain why the public often senses danger at the slightest residue. In his opinion, the heated debate has to do with the so-called uncertainty avoidance index. This is very high in Germany – but probably also in Switzerland. The fear of the unknown leads to the establishment of rigid rules, regulations and laws.

Referat von Jo Riehle, Lebensmittelchemiker, Buchautor und Pestizidexperte.

«One driver of the discussion, however, is the vastly improved analytics. Today, we can find anything if we look for it», says Riehle. «The fact that fewer different active substances were found in the past also has to do with resistance management. There are fewer ‹one-fits-all› products today. Today's pesticides have a much more specific effect.» From an ecological point of view, this makes sense. At the same time, however, a greater number of different substances are found. This in turn would be perceived as «dangerous» by the public, says Riehle. There is also the fear of «multiple residues». «However, the mere detectability of different substances does not mean a higher health risk», says the pesticide expert.

The topic is complex. The speakers would like to see a more objective debate and call for common sense. This is precisely the aim of swiss-food.ch.

Related articles

Without biocides, animal welfare and food safety suffer

Without biocides, animal welfare and food safety suffer

At the Swiss-Food Talk, three experts underlined the importance of biocides for agriculture and food processing. The conclusion of the talk: without biocides, food safety and animal welfare could not be guaranteed.

Content in German

New breeding methods – here to stay
New Breeding Technologies Knowledge

New breeding methods – here to stay

The Swiss Parliament has decided to update the genetic engineering moratorium that has been in place since 2005. The step was overdue. On the occasion of a webinar organized by swiss-food.ch, experts from science and agriculture spoke about the benefits of new biotechnological breeding methods. It became clear: the risks are low, the opportunities are great.

You can't do without healthy, high-quality food from Switzerland

You can't do without healthy, high-quality food from Switzerland

At the Swiss-Food Talk, three recognised experts gave answers to current questions in connection with a healthy, sustainable diet. And made an appeal to common sense.

Content in German

Challenges and opportunities of sustainable agriculture

Challenges and opportunities of sustainable agriculture

Tomorrow's agriculture must produce more efficiently. And at the same time protect the climate and biodiversity. At the Swiss-Food Talk, three renowned, independent experts spoke about the challenges and opportunities of tomorrow's sustainable agriculture.

Content in German

The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies
Knowledge

The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies

Science serves as a basis for political decisions, including in nature conservation. However, a key question is: how trustworthy are the underlying studies and data? An article in the «NZZ am Sonntag» and the explanations provided by Quarks offer revealing perspectives on the quality of scientific studies and the possible misuse of figures.

How can biodiversity be protected effectively?
Knowledge

How can biodiversity be protected effectively?

Biodiversity is essential to life. And it is currently a very topical issue. The obligation to set aside areas of Swiss farmland for biodiversity promotion has clearly not achieved the desired objectives. Recently published studies indicate that species diversity remains under pressure. This is what prompted swiss-food, in the latest of its series of talks with three established experts, to focus on the tensions between biodiversity and agriculture and to shed some light on the reasons for these.

Why AI has not yet had its breakthrough in agriculture
Knowledge

Why AI has not yet had its breakthrough in agriculture

Artificial intelligence is gaining ground in many areas. However, the new technology does not yet seem to have really arrived in agriculture. The reason for this is nature, which is throwing a spanner in the works of AI. Nevertheless, the opportunities that AI could offer agriculture are immense.

Nutrition: Does the future belong to the green gene scissors?
Knowledge

Nutrition: Does the future belong to the green gene scissors?

New plant varieties contribute to security of supply. The new breeding methods known as "gene scissors", such as Crispr, have the potential to revolutionise agriculture and nutrition.

More contributions from Knowledge