In many cases, synthetic pesticides are superior to substances that are obtained from nature. The public often overlooks several undisputed and important advantages of synthetically produced substances – including some medicines.

Being able to manufacture substances synthetically also has a positive impact on animals and biodiversity. Synthetic substances do not need to be obtained directly from an animal, as is the case, for example, with pheromones, which are used as a key element in organic farming. Pheromones are chemicals pests used to attract mates, and obtaining them “naturally” means extracting the substance from millions of moths or butterflies. The same is true for other beneficial substances.

As the «TagesAnzeiger» reports, ursodeoxycholic acid – an ingredient in medicines used to treat gallstones – is produced by the sun bear in its gallbladder. For decades, it has been possible to produce it synthetically, making it necessary to insert a catheter into a sun bear’s gallbladder. Here the advantages of synthetic production are clear. Yet bears continue to be kept in cramped cages on “gallbladder farms” so the substance can be extracted from them quote-unquote naturally.

Synthetic pesticides are economical and environmentally responsible

When a substance is discovered that has the desired characteristics to combat pests or treat diseases the question immediately arises as to whether it is available in nature. In many cases, the substances can only be isolated from natural sources with great effort, especially in the necessary quantities. Synthetic production may also be much more sustainable. For example, in order to extract a sufficient quantity of pyrethrum, which is permitted as a insecticide in organic farming, chrysanthemums are planted in large monocultures using conventional farming, primarily in Africa. The environmental impact is significantly reduced when the insecticide is produced synthetically. Finally, synthetic production makes it possible to remove the characteristics of substances that have a negative effect on people and nature, characteristics that would otherwise rightly prevent them from receiving permission to be used.

Synthetic pesticides are stable

Many synthetic substances are able to take effect over a longer period of time because they have stable properties and are less sensitive to light. Furthermore, they remain on the plants longer than many of their natural counterparts, which quickly wash away in the rain or sun. The benefits are clear: fewer tractor paths are needed. In other words, synthetic pesticides can help preserve nature and the climate.

Synthetic pesticides are efficient and economical

The application rate of pesticides per hectare has fallen by 95 percent since 1950. Now a much smaller dose can be applied in order to achieve the same effect. At the same time, modern pesticides are much safer. The average toxicity has decreased by 40 percent since the 1960s, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). New products remain in the soil for less time. For example, in the 1980s, the average time it took for half the active substance to break down was 72 days. This time has dropped to 53 days for modern products.

Synthetic pesticides increase food safety and production

Global production of food has tripled since 1960. And it did so without a substantial increase the amount cultivated land. The continued growth of the global population continues to be a major challenge for food producers. Particularly in view of climate change and declining water reserves, pesticides will continue to contribute significantly to feeding the world’s population. The UN recognized this fact and declared 2020 to be the “International Year of Plant Health.” This would not be possible without synthetically produced resources.