
Differing perceptions
While the increasing administrative burden is perceived as the main concern in the economy, parts of the population see it differently. Meanwhile, regulations are repeatedly misused as a means of exerting power in the competitive struggle – to the detriment of SMEs.
Thursday, February 6, 2025
On the final day of the three-day winter conference in Klosters, the Swiss Trade Association (SGV) welcomed the head of the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER), Federal Councillor Guy Parmelin. Before Parmelin's appearance, a presentation titled ‘The guiding hand of the state – on subsidies and regulations’ by Eric Scheidegger, Head of the Directorate for Economic Policy and Deputy Director of the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO, had launched the Friday morning. Scheidegger noted that the perception of the administrative burden in the economy – here it remains the main concern – and the population is different.
The Corporate Relief Act and the regulatory impact assessment are part of a toolbox for ‘good regulation’. In addition, the proposals of the Gaillard Group on the review of tasks and subsidies are important. Even in the (unlikely) event that all of them were fully implemented, the growth in expenditure would continue to rise. Therefore, there can be no question of ‘breaking the state through savings’, as the left loudly complains.
‘GMV instead of ESG'
Beat Brechbühl, a lawyer and managing partner at Kellerhals Carrard, gave a witty presentation on the tiresome topic of ESG regulation. The current sustainability religion of ESG – environmental, social and corporate governance – prioritises form over substance, with sustainability reports acting as ‘sedatives and smoke bombs’, and a policy of ‘one step forward, two steps back’ on regulation cannot be sustainable per se, said Brechbühl. ‘ESG reduces added value and is therefore particularly harmful to SMEs.’ Brechbühl called for ‘common sense instead of ESG’: common sense instead of declaration obligations à gogo.
Regarding the new corporate responsibility initiative 2.0, which, according to the initiators, apparently ‘does not affect’ SMEs, Brechbühl said: ‘These are the sounds of a shawm; the real goal is to divide the economy.’
Changing mindsets
In the discussion ‘Switzerland – in the middle of a regulatory jungle?’, National Councillors Lars Guggisberg (SVP/BE) and Heinz Theiler (FDP/SZ), Daniel Wyss, President of the Swiss Gunsmiths and Arms Dealers Association, and Urs Furrer, Director of the Swiss Trade Association, met.
‘The left has managed to get the general public to equate ‘the economy’ with big business,’ Guggisberg noted. ’We have to change that, otherwise we will lose more votes.’
Theiler pointed out that large service providers were passing on regulations to SMEs in order to prove their own sustainability.
Wyss used the example of the arms industry to show how banks and insurance companies terminate long-standing customer relationships at short notice for image reasons, ‘even though we are always there for the army and the police, as well as for all those security services that protect these service providers, and support them with our work.’
Furrer pointed out that regulations – including in the area of ESG – are repeatedly misused as a competitive tool, and made an appeal to politicians: ‘Think of SMEs whenever you decide on regulations.’ After all, Switzerland's more than 600,000 SMEs account for a whopping 99.8 per cent of all companies in our country – not nothing, you might think.
Kindly note:
We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.
We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.
Related articles

PFAS regulation in Switzerland: Not faster, but better
Some people also call PFAS ‘forever chemicals’. Their use must be regulated as wisely as possible. To do this, the federal government first needs to do precise groundwork, according to Stefan Brupbacher, Urs Furrer and Stephan Mumenthaler.

As if there was no time limit in this country
The EU has been stuck on the regulation of new breeding technologies for years. Switzerland is also missing out on developments. While innovative approaches are already being used commercially worldwide, Europe and Switzerland lack clear rules – with far-reaching consequences for local farmers, breeders and seed propagators, as well as for global trade.

Clearing house for patent rights: Not in the interests of inventors and food security
On 22 May 2024, the Federal Council submitted a draft revision of patent law for consultation. A new clearing centre is planned to improve the transparency of patents in the field of plant breeding. While transparency is fundamentally positive, the chosen approach is problematic. Instead of the beneficiaries, it imposes new obligations on innovators and means that Switzerland is going it alone. This is a bad signal for innovative companies.

Domestic production as a blind spot
Switzerland's food security is increasingly under pressure: last year's disastrous wheat and potato harvests have led to an increasing dependence on imports. However, the report by the Federal Office for National Economic Supply (FONES) is largely silent on the precarious state of the domestic agricultural sector. The IG BauernUnternehmen (Farmers' Company) has therefore sharply criticised the federal government.

PFAS regulation in Switzerland: Not faster, but better
Some people also call PFAS ‘forever chemicals’. Their use must be regulated as wisely as possible. To do this, the federal government first needs to do precise groundwork, according to Stefan Brupbacher, Urs Furrer and Stephan Mumenthaler.

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing
A large majority of the Swiss population recognises the advantages of targeted plant breeding using genome editing. This is shown by a survey conducted by gfs.bern.

In plant breeding the music plays elsewhere
Switzerland is a centre of innovation, but unfortunately this promise has not yet been kept when it comes to the more modern methods of plant breeding. Openness would be a good thing for innovative Switzerland here too.