Confidence in breakthrough technologies

Confidence in breakthrough technologies

A global survey of 13,000 people in 13 countries shows that people are fundamentally positive about new technologies. The study also reveals a clear correlation between knowledge and attitude: the more people know about a technology, the more positively they view it.

Friday, January 24, 2025

Leaps by Bayer and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) have conducted one of the most extensive global surveys on the acceptance of breakthrough technologies. A total of 13,000 people from 13 countries on all continents except Antarctica took part. The participants were asked about their attitudes towards cell and gene therapies, AI in medicine, new breeding technologies in agriculture and cultured meat. The results show optimism towards science and technology. However, there is a lack of trust in some western countries. Scepticism is fuelled by a lack of knowledge and trust: the study found a clear correlation between the knowledge of the respondents about a technology and how optimistic they are about it.

The same picture is emerging in Switzerland, as highlighted by a survey conducted by gfs.bern: 44 per cent of respondents were undecided about genome-edited plants. However, after a brief explanation, 64 per cent viewed the technology as useful – and this view was shared across party lines. It is clear that the world relies on groundbreaking technologies. Not only can they overcome current challenges such as crop failures or climate change, but they can also gain social acceptance – if trust is created.


Key findings from the global survey

Optimism about science is greater in certain regions: Overall, 72 per cent of survey participants are optimistic about the direction the world is taking in terms of science and technology. Middle-income countries, such as China (86 per cent) and Nigeria (94 per cent), are more optimistic about science than high-income Western countries such as France (53 per cent), Germany (54 per cent) or the USA (68 per cent).

The West is suffering from a crisis of confidence: Overall, 62 per cent of respondents trust health authorities to act in the best interests of the public. Trust in Western countries is significantly lower – for example, 48 per cent in France and 56 per cent in the US – compared to middle-income countries such as China (73 per cent) and Nigeria (86 per cent).

Positive attitudes towards new breeding technologies: most respondents (56 per cent globally) have a positive view of the use of NZTs in agriculture, particularly when such technologies are used to make crops more resilient to climate change. 47 per cent of European respondents have a positive view of NZTs and 34 per cent are neutral, while only 12 per cent have a negative view. This openness is noteworthy given that the use of NZTs remains highly restricted in Europe.

In an era of shifting geopolitics, society's need for solutions to climate change, strained healthcare systems and global nutrition remains as pressing as ever. But new technologies alone are only part of the answer. Increased knowledge and trust are paramount to public acceptance of new technologies that can improve human health and well-being.

About Leaps by Bayer

Leaps by Bayer aims to solve ten of the greatest challenges facing humanity through breakthrough innovation. As Bayer's strategic impact investment unit, we have already invested over $2 billion in more than 65 companies pursuing novel scientific approaches in the areas of health and agriculture. We aim to use these investments in emerging technology platforms to overcome ten significant challenges (‘leaps’). www.leaps.bayer.com

Kindly note:

We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.

We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.

Related articles

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing
Politics

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing

A large majority of the Swiss population recognises the advantages of targeted plant breeding using genome editing. This is shown by a survey conducted by gfs.bern.

Food trends: Innovative technologies are indispensable
Knowledge

Food trends: Innovative technologies are indispensable

Climate change and environmental problems will change our eating habits. The food of the future will have to be both good for us – and good for the planet.

Arguments for new breeding technologies
New Breeding Technologies Politics

Arguments for new breeding technologies

Plant breeding is complex. Accordingly, there are many questions in the discussion surrounding new breeding methods. swiss-food.ch has compiled the most important questions and answers on new breeding technologies.

Tradition and innovation go hand in hand when it comes to food
Knowledge

Tradition and innovation go hand in hand when it comes to food

The study ‘Decoding Food Culture’ by the Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute shows how deeply food culture shapes our lives. That is why it is a balancing act between tradition and innovation to bring about changes in nutrition.

The underestimated danger of plant toxins
Knowledge

The underestimated danger of plant toxins

Plants produce a variety of chemical substances to protect themselves against predators and diseases, for example. These substances can have a toxic effect in high doses. A recent study by Agroscope highlights the danger of natural substances in Swiss waters.

Natural is naturally dangerous – Why the plant's own poisons are underestimated
Knowledge

Natural is naturally dangerous – Why the plant's own poisons are underestimated

Many believe that natural foods are safer than those with synthetic pesticides. But plants produce their own poisons – and these are often just as risky. While artificial residues are regulated, natural defences are largely ignored. A fallacy, as scientist Bruce Ames shows.

From molecule to crop protection product
Plant protection Knowledge

From molecule to crop protection product

On average, five crop protection products are approved for the market each year worldwide. Developing new products is challenging, time-consuming and expensive. It takes more than 12 years from the start of the search for a suitable substance to the approval of the market-ready product. The costs amount to more than 300 million US dollars. Every new crop protection product must meet strict requirements. The approval procedures for crop protection products are comparable to those for new drugs.

More contributions from Knowledge