Seizing the opportunity of green biotechnology
It's crucial for Switzerland to reestablish its leadership in biotechnology and actively contribute to addressing global concerns. Achieving this requires greater courage and openness to new technologies.
Monday, September 5, 2022
This guest commentary by Roman Mazzotta, Country President Syngenta Switzerland, was first published in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung on 21 August 2023.
The imminent challenge for the world is to ensure affordable food for an anticipated global population of nearly ten billion by 2050, all while safeguarding our climate and environment. Among the pivotal solutions is plant breeding, notably illustrated by the Nobel Prize-winning Crispr-Cas9 genetic scissors. This allows for the precise and swift enhancement of existing plant varieties without introducing foreign genes. As a result, we can develop crops that are more resistant to diseases and droughts.
The EU has highlighted the significance of these new breeding technologies for a more sustainable agriculture and announced its intentions to revise regulations surrounding them. This decision by the EU also profoundly influences Switzerland's political approach to these new technologies. Historically, Switzerland missed numerous opportunities in embracing plant biotechnology. In the early 2000s, it was at the forefront of modern plant breeding and agricultural genetic engineering. A notable breakthrough was the "Golden Rice" developed by ETH professor Ingo Potrykus. This innovation presented a potential solution to protect children in developing countries from the perils of vitamin A deficiency, including blindness and death. Unfortunately, several environmental and aid organizations continue to block its widespread adoption.
The private sector also strongly pursued plant breeding research during this period. However, a blanket moratorium on genetic engineering rendered Switzerland a less appealing research destination. This led to the migration of pioneering research to foreign soils. Today, outside of Agroscope's governmental breeding department, there is little expertise left in applied plant genetics. Due to this moratorium, Swiss farmers are deprived of the advancements of green genetic engineering. For instance, they are prohibited from cultivating a specific corn variety, developed using novel technologies, known to reduce methane emissions from cows. They are also barred from growing mildew-tolerant wheat.
While the public remains open to novel technologies when the advantages are evident, there are adversaries who strive to prolong a detrimental blockade policy by shifting the debate's focus. A rising point of criticism is the patenting of seeds. A prevalent misconception is that primarily large corporations stand to gain from these patents. Such a narrative is both one-sided and false. In reality, patents are the cornerstone of Switzerland's successful economic model. They safeguard the interests of the entire Swiss economic ecosystem, from individual inventors to SMEs competing globally. Current patent regulations are clear: Neither Switzerland nor the EU grants patents on plant varieties. Furthermore, in Europe, properties of a plant resulting from traditional breeding methods remain non-patentable.
Contrary to widespread belief, large corporations don't monopolize access to genetic resources and seeds. Companies like Syngenta have streamlined the process for small farmers to obtain protected seeds. Syngenta champions transparency by listing their plant patents in public databases and dedicated licensing platforms. This enables even the smallest plant breeders to examine Syngenta's patents related to specific plant varieties in Switzerland and potentially obtain a license.
The European Commission has recently brought forward a new law for new breeding technologies in agriculture. Meanwhile, there's an eager anticipation in Switzerland regarding the Federal Council's proposal on the matter. It's crucial for Switzerland to reestablish its leadership in biotechnology and actively contribute to addressing global concerns. Achieving this requires greater courage and openness to new technologies.
We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.
We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.
Journalist, publicist, publisher and historian
Head of Knowledge Team Tamedia
Babette Sigg Frank
President of the Swiss Consumer Forum (KF)
Country President Syngenta Switzerland
Journalist at Lebensmittel Zeitung
Development Editor-in-Chief Agrar-Medien
“Ecological methods alone won’t cut it”
Columnist at Genetic Literacy Project and AGDaily
CEO Syngenta Group
President of Syngenta Crop Protection
Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine
Professor of Crop Science, ETH Zurich
Head of Biotechnology at Scienceindustries
Lecturer in Sustainability, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL
Agricultural scientist and president of Agroecology Science
Professor of Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich
Head of Nutrition and Agriculture at scienceindustries
Dr. Teresa Koller
Researcher at the Institute of Plant and Microbiology at the University of Zurich
Professor for Molecular Plant Breeding, ETH Zurich
Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine
Head of Business Sustainability, Syngenta Switzerland
The EU Commission has decided to endorse the assessment of the European Food Safety Authority, which found no critical problem areas regarding the effects of glyphosate on the environment and human and animal health. The EU Commission's science-based decision to extend the authorisation for a further 10 years is also a rejection of the scare campaigns by Greenpeace and Co.
The reduced use of plant protection products is causing much smaller wheat and rapeseed harvests. A study carried out by Swiss Agricultural Research reveals that such crop failures can only be offset by state subsidies. This is neither sustainable nor resource-efficient.
More and more invasive pests are spreading in Switzerland. The most recent example is the Asian hornet, which poses a major threat to the native honey bee. But other invasive species also threaten agriculture and biodiversity. Control measures are many and varied. But pesticides (plant protection products and biocides) remain an important tool in the fight against the pests.
At the end of October, swiss-food.ch hosted a film screening and panel discussion in Zurich on the subject of genome editing entitled “Between Protest and Potential”. The well-attended event dealt with the emotional debates in recent decades surrounding genetic engineering. The event showed that the situation has changed fundamentally.