Questions about solidarity in agricultural production remain open
The war between Russia and Ukraine threatens the global food supply. Security of supply is also becoming an issue in Switzerland. In the last spring session, parliamentarians from various parties wanted to know from the Federal Council how it intends to react to the changed global food supply situation. The Federal Council's replies do not yet reflect a fundamental reassessment of the situation.
Wednesday, March 16, 2022
Ukraine and Russia are responsible for around 40 percent of global wheat production. As a result of the conflict between the two countries, food prices have skyrocketed. Crop failures due to the fighting are threatening the food supply of many countries - especially in North Africa and the Middle East. The FAO is already warning of additional hunger. Rich Switzerland is not primarily affected by the supply crisis, but things can get tight for people in poorer countries. The FAO already expects hunger to spread. Domestic production is thus also related to solidarity. The warning signs are there. What actually happens next depends on how the situation in Ukraine develops.
Burning questions...
Against this background, National Councilor Alois Huber (SVP, AG) wanted to know from the Federal Council during question time what measures it is taking to increase food self-sufficiency and thus relieve poorer countries (22.7283). National Councilor Martin Haab (SVP, ZH) asked a similar question. He wanted to know from the Federal Council to what extent it intends to include the challenges of ensuring global food security in Switzerland's future agricultural policy (22.7256). National Councilor Ida Glanzmann-Hunkeler (CVP, LU) wanted to know: “How can Switzerland assume its responsibility and increase its own agricultural production in solidarity so that increasing imports do not promote hunger in the world?” (22.7202). And National Councilor Alois Gmür (CVP, SZ) asked the Federal Council: “What is the Federal Council doing in view of the looming global supply crisis in the food sector?” (22.7223).
...waiting answers
The Federal Council remained vague in the answers and initially responded with numbers: Switzerland's direct dependencies are relatively small. “In terms of the total volume of imports per product, only 2 percent of the grain, 4 percent of the animal feed and 4.5 percent of the vegetable oils and fats imported into Switzerland come from these two countries.” (22.7223) He refers to existing agricultural policy instruments, such as the possibility of adjusting direct payments and contributions for individual crops, which could be used to create incentives for increased production if necessary. The Federal Council also emphasizes that compulsory stocks can be released in the event of acute supply bottlenecks. Various intervention measures would be checked on an ongoing basis. These include import promotion, sales restrictions or production optimization to increase the degree of self-sufficiency. However, the Federal Council replies: “However, optimizing production is not a suitable measure to overcome short-term bottlenecks.” The Federal Council does not appear to be contemplating long-term measures.
How and whether future agricultural policy will do justice to the new situation remains unanswered. Rather, he refers to the still outstanding report on the postulate 20.3931, “Future orientation of agricultural policy”, which is to be published in summer 2022. It will therefore be interesting to see whether the report also contains a new assessment of the situation with regard to security of supply. As far as the question of international solidarity for productive agriculture is concerned, the Federal Council has largely failed to answer the parliamentarians. However, it is hardly sustainable to rely on less and less productive agriculture and more and more imports in times of climate change and turbulent world markets. This is currently being shown painfully in energy policy.
Related articles
In plant breeding the music plays elsewhere
Switzerland is a centre of innovation, but unfortunately this promise has not yet been kept when it comes to the more modern methods of plant breeding. Openness would be a good thing for innovative Switzerland here too.
Enabling what is inevitable
The opponents of progress are once again in the starting blocks. In mid-April, critics of genetic engineering announced a popular initiative aimed at making any relaxation of the existing moratorium on genetic engineering impossible. The exact wording is not yet known, but the statements made by the exponents make it clear that the total blockade on modern plant breeding is to be enshrined in the constitution.
EU decision in favour of new breeding methods with stumbling blocks
On 7 February, the EU Parliament voted in favour of approving the new genomic breeding methods in the EU. MEPs voted in favour of a corresponding proposal by 307 votes to 263 with 41 abstentions. Further deliberations will now follow.
Authorisation of new crop protection products: federal government hesitates, parliament exerts pressure
In Switzerland, the authorisation of new crop protection products is stalling. And there is a disturbing asymmetry. The federal government immediately withdraws authorisations for crop protection products that the EU takes off the market.