Late blight: utilising resistance from wild potatoes
Late blight is one of the most dangerous potato diseases. It causes an estimated 20 per cent loss in potato harvests every year. In both organic and conventional agriculture, the use of crop protection products is necessary to prevent major losses due to the fungal disease. Research and innovation are needed to reduce the amount of pesticides used. Agricultural biotechnology can be used to equip potatoes with a resistance gene against late blight. The use of crop protection products can be reduced to a minimum.
Monday, July 6, 2020
The most important facts in brief:
- Late blight can cause devastating damage in potato cultivation.
- The fungal disease can usually be controlled well with the use of crop protection products.
- An alternative would be a variety that is resistant to the pathogen.
Late blight (Phytophthora infestans) is the potato's worst enemy. It is an egg fungus that causes the disease in potatoes. The pathogen is notorious for its extremely rapid spread and flexibility. It has the ability to react to control strategies with new forms and is therefore difficult to combat. In the middle of the 19th century, the fungal disease destroyed almost the entire potato crop in Ireland in several consecutive years and caused a famine of historic proportions. Around one million people starved to death. Several million Irish emigrated to Australia or North America.
Costly control
Thanks to fungicides, late blight no longer causes comparable damage in Europe. However, combating the disease is still very costly. While farmers in conventional agriculture have a wide range of modern synthetic crop protection products at their disposal, the only effective product authorised in organic farming is copper, which is also produced synthetically (the effect of other products such as whey, rock flour or horsetail extract is highly controversial). The spraying intervals must be kept very short, especially with organic products. In warm and humid weather, treatment must be carried out weekly. Without treatment, there is a risk of major crop losses. At the same time, resource-efficient agriculture must minimise the use of crop protection products. Innovative techniques are needed to significantly reduce the use of fungicides.
Resistant wild potatoes
Researchers have been working for years on breeding Phytophthora-resistant potatoes. A successful solution already exists. Using molecular biological methods, resistance genes from wild potatoes can be inserted into existing varieties. Various wild potato species have natural resistance to the pathogen that causes late blight. Attempts to cross them into potato varieties using conventional breeding methods were often unsuccessful. After a few years, the mutated fungus returned and broke through the resistant properties of the potatoes. Crossbreeding also always passes on undesirable characteristics, which can have negative effects on flavour, for example. Getting rid of these by backcrossing is a lengthy process.
Efficient agricultural biotechnology
Biotech methods are much faster. The exact gene sequences from wild potatoes that are required for the transfer and expression of the resistance genes can be inserted into existing varieties. The new potatoes created in this way therefore only contain genes specific to the species and are therefore referred to as cisgenic. Field trials in the Netherlands and Ireland showed that all potato varieties (equipped with one or more resistance genes) were more resistant to the pathogen than the conventional original varieties. Potatoes with three combined resistance genes remained completely resistant until the end of the season. With this method and suitable resistance management, up to 80 per cent of the quantities of fungicides can be saved.
Opportunity for sustainable agriculture
The technology for producing Phytophthora-resistant potatoes is available. The plants are available and have proven themselves in years of field trials in Switzerland and the rest of Europe. The efficiency of the biotech method is obvious. However, due to the moratorium on genetic engineering in Switzerland, the cultivation of genetically modified plants is prohibited, even though this could save large amounts of crop protection products. This example makes it clear that research and development of new technologies are the key to more resource-efficient agriculture. Agricultural biotechnology therefore represents a great opportunity for more sustainable agriculture. By contrast, technology bans are of little use to the environment.
Related articles
Hazard is not the same as risk: how we understand – and should understand – threshold values
In this episode of the podcast, risk researcher Angela Bearth discusses residues and threshold values in food – a topic often debated emotionally. In public discussions, threshold values tend to dominate, while the complex challenges of agriculture are rarely considered. Studies show, however, that once these relationships are explained and solutions are addressed, people respond in a more differentiated way.
PFAS, trade-offs and responsibility – how politics and agriculture find solutions
In this episode of the joint series by Agrarpolitik – der Podcast and swiss-food.ch, National Councillor Christine Badertscher discusses how residues and threshold values are debated in Parliament. The extraordinary session on PFAS during the Swiss Parliament’s 2025 autumn session was remarkably factual. For Badertscher, one thing is clear: PFAS are a problem that affects everyone. Accordingly, there was broad political willingness to initiate first measures such as funding research, examining possible labelling requirements, and providing support for farms whose soils are contaminated with PFAS residues.
Thresholds, approvals, responsibility – how plant protection products are really assessed
Threshold values are often at the centre of public debate – yet in reality they represent only a small part of a much broader system for risk assessment. In this episode of Agrarpolitik – der Podcast and swiss-food.ch, Michael Beer, Head of the Food and Nutrition Division at the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), explains how plant protection products are authorised and monitored in Switzerland.
Pesticides in Water: The sources are more varied and closer than we think
A new national study reveals that pesticide contamination in Swiss rivers and streams has more complex causes than previously assumed. While substances still originate from agriculture, a considerable share enters waterways through other pathways.