A new lease on life for unusable farmland
Fertile farmland is one of the most valuable resources in the world. Such land is scarce, however, and is likely to become even scarcer due to the rising global demand for food. This is bad news for the environment and for biodiversity, particularly in light of growing pressure from deforestation. It is vital that degraded agricultural land is restored and made fertile once more. The technology already exists, but financial stimuli are needed to make it happen.
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
The United Nations projects that the global population will reach 10 billion by 2050, which is around 2 billion more people than today. This poses huge challenges for agriculture: Food production must increase significantly, while fertile agricultural land is becoming an increasingly scarce commodity. According to Fortune, the world has rendered more than a third of its arable land unusable in the last 40 years. In many cases, the soil has been depleted by too many decades of poor practices, like overgrazing by livestock, misuse of chemicals and fertilizers, or planting the same crops season after season.
Clearing cheaper than restoration
The degradation of arable land is leading to serious ecological problems as forests are cleared to create more farmland. This, in turn, results in a loss of biodiversity and important carbon sinks. Restoring degraded land represents a better option for both the environment and for wildlife. The knowledge and technologies are already available, but because clearing forests is often cheaper than recultivating degraded land, farmers do not have sufficient incentives.
Providing incentives for farmers
The Syngenta Group and the Nature Conservancy, a global conservation organization, have set the goal of restoring one million hectares of degraded pastureland in Brazil, working together with farmers there. The project aims to encourage more efficient and sustainable cattle ranching on existing pasture, as well as growing soybeans and other crops on degraded pastures that can be restored. To date, farms with a total of 31,400 hectares of land have committed to the project. Embrapa, a Brazilian public agricultural research institute, and Itaú BBA, one of the largest banks in Latin America, are also participating in the project. The cooperation ensures an attractive return on investment and offers farmers the necessary incentives to stop them clearing more forest.
Sources
Related articles
Residues, thresholds, trust – looking calmly behind the headlines
In this conversation with toxicologist Lothar Aicher, the discussion focuses on how residues enter the body, how their potential harm is assessed, and what role modern analytical methods play.
Hazard is not the same as risk: how we understand – and should understand – threshold values
In this episode of the podcast, risk researcher Angela Bearth discusses residues and threshold values in food – a topic often debated emotionally. In public discussions, threshold values tend to dominate, while the complex challenges of agriculture are rarely considered. Studies show, however, that once these relationships are explained and solutions are addressed, people respond in a more differentiated way.
PFAS, trade-offs and responsibility – how politics and agriculture find solutions
In this episode of the joint series by Agrarpolitik – der Podcast and swiss-food.ch, National Councillor Christine Badertscher discusses how residues and threshold values are debated in Parliament.
Thresholds, approvals, responsibility – how plant protection products are really assessed
Threshold values are often at the centre of public debate – yet in reality they are only a small part of a much broader risk assessment system. Dr Michael Beer, Head of the Food and Nutrition Division at the Federal Food Safety Office, provides clarity.