"Organic products can feed the world"
To produce the same amount of food, organic agriculture needs around 40 percent more space than conventional agriculture. In order to be able to feed the growing world population completely organically, up to 80 percent more space would be needed in the future. Huge forest areas would also have to be cleared in order to have enough arable land available.
Tuesday, February 23, 2021
In brief:
- In order for the world to be able to be fed exclusively on organically produced food, it would take dramatically more cultivation areas.
- The additional area would be at the expense of moors, forests and nature reserves. Biodiversity would be put under further pressure. In addition, in the context of climate change, more cultivation areas are not an option.
- In Addition: Putting energy, labor and raw materials into cultivation with little or no yield is not resource-efficient. Crop losses mean lower incomes for farmers and higher consumer prices, are unecological and are a burden on the climate.
By 2050, the world's population will grow to almost 10 billion people. This means: Demand for food is up 50 percent compared to 2013. This is what the UN Food Organization FAO says. Up to 81 percent more space would be needed to produce enough food from 100 percent biological production. This was calculated by the Research Institute for Biological Agriculture (Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau, FiBL). In addition, fluctuations in yields in organic farming have a greater impact due to lower productivity. The yield stability of organic agriculture is lower. This has implications for food security.
Large yield losses
The reason for the higher land consumption in organic agriculture is the lower yields. Greenpeace assumes in the «course book for the turn to agriculture 2050" that the yields in agriculture in Germany would fall by an average of 40 percent if the entire conversion to organic farming was completed. In the case of wheat – Switzerland's most commonly grown crop – the decrease in yield is almost 60 percent. In 2013, in a study commissioned by Agrar, an Industrial Association, agricultural scientists at the Humboldt University in Berlin and agripol calculated that in Germany, if the country fully switched to organic farming, 12.1 million tons less wheat would be produced per year. This corresponds to the amount needed, per year, to feed 184 million people.
Blindspot article
Sources
Related articles
Is Organic More Sustainable?
Organic food is considered a prime example of sustainability – but in reality, it often ends up in the waste bin faster than conventional products. The omission of artificial preservatives and modern plant protection drastically shortens shelf life and leads to more food waste.
"Natural is healthy, chemicals are toxic."
Everything that occurs in nature is healthy and synthetically produced substances, i.e. "chemical" substances, are toxic. This myth is fundamentally wrong: There are many highly toxic substances in nature, and at the same time there are many synthetic substances that are absolutely harmless.
Future Foods: Sustainable, but also economically viable?
In the face of climate change, increasing pest pressure and a growing global population, agriculture is confronted with enormous challenges. To ensure long-term food security, new crops are gaining attention. A recent study highlights the potential of 30 “Future Foods” for Switzerland. However, success requires more than good intentions.
Myths about food production
Having the “right” diet is playing an increasingly more important role in the lives of a great many people. A healthy lifestyle has become a status symbol. Healthy foods and sustainable production methods have been the subject of many extremely emotional debates. A wide range of outdated ideas and myths have taken root in the minds of a large number of consumers. Below, we will take a look at some myths and their deconstruction.