"Natural is healthy, chemicals are toxic."
Everything that occurs in nature is healthy and synthetically produced substances, i.e. "chemical" substances, are toxic. This myth is fundamentally wrong: There are many highly toxic substances in nature, and at the same time there are many synthetic substances that are absolutely harmless.
Saturday, November 2, 2019
In brief
- The possibility of producing active substances synthetically also has a positive effect on animal life and biodiversity.
- "Natural" heavy metals can be very harmful if used incorrectly.
- The fungus toxin aflatoxin is highly carcinogenic. However, the use of suitable fungicides can prevent this risk.
Particularly in connection with plant protection products, the opinion is widespread that natural is good and chemicals are bad. But such a black and white outlook is factually wrong and ill-considered.
Synthetic production of natural identical substances
Many synthetic plant protection products are identical to nature. The possibility of producing active substances synthetically also has a positive effect on animal life and biodiversity. This is because it prevents useful substances from being taken directly from an animal. This applies, for example, to the important pheromones in organic farming. These are substances used to attract harmful insects. In a "natural" way, the active substance would have to be extracted from millions of butterflies.
The application is crucial
Even potentially dangerous plant protection products, whether produced synthetically or directly from nature, are safe for humans, animals and the environment when used correctly. Conversely, naturally occurring substances such as copper, popular in the organic farming industry, can be very harmful if used incorrectly. Copper accumulates in the soil and has a toxic effect on soil organisms such as earthworms. Copper can also have a negative effect on human health. Even untreated, "natural" foods can be dangerous. This is when they contain residues of the fungus toxin aflatoxin. This is considered to be highly carcinogenic. However, the use of suitable fungicides can prevent this risk. Another example is poisonous weeds that can be harvested with the main product. The use of herbicides such as glyphosate can prevent toxins from unwanted plants from contaminating the crop. The examples show: "Natural" can also be toxic.
Blindspot article
Ultimately, everything is chemistry
Chemistry is usually equated with the synthetic production of substances in the laboratory. But there are also people and much of what they do every day is chemistry, as this shortvideoclearly shows. Synthesis refers to the process of making a compound from elements or a new substance from compounds. Basically, this has nothing to do with poison at all. Natural substances can also be produced synthetically. The synthetic production of plant protection products offers many advantages and can also relieve the environment. Find out more here.
Related articles
‘No genetic engineering’ is simply not an option!
For years, politicians and environmental organisations have been stirring up unnecessary fears about a technology that has been helping to conserve resources and protect the environment for decades, while improving the quality and tolerability of food and cosmetics. It is time to put an end to this consumer deception.
«The protection of cultures is no longer guaranteed»
Swiss agriculture is in a tight spot when it comes to crop protection. At the Swiss-Food Talk on July 1, 2025, three producer representatives described how bans, the lack of alternatives, and lengthy approval procedures are putting pressure on their crops.
Chasing Misinformation Feels Like Herding Cats
Science fiction has a way of masquerading as science fact — until someone like me comes with a bucket of cold, hard evidence. But let’s be real: debunking nonsense takes exponentially more effort than producing it. Jonathan Swift knew it in 1710, and here I am, centuries later, still speaking my truth before the next viral misinformation dumpster fire.
Climate protection must not jeopardise food security
Agriculture is increasingly under pressure to become climate-neutral. But how can this be achieved without jeopardising food security? In the agricultural policy podcast, Hannah von Ballmoos-Hofer, head of the energy division at the Swiss Farmers' Union, emphasises that climate protection is important, but must not come at the expense of food security.