"Natural is healthy, chemicals are toxic."
Everything that occurs in nature is healthy and synthetically produced substances, i.e. "chemical" substances, are toxic. This myth is fundamentally wrong: There are many highly toxic substances in nature, and at the same time there are many synthetic substances that are absolutely harmless.
Saturday, November 2, 2019
In brief
- The possibility of producing active substances synthetically also has a positive effect on animal life and biodiversity.
- "Natural" heavy metals can be very harmful if used incorrectly.
- The fungus toxin aflatoxin is highly carcinogenic. However, the use of suitable fungicides can prevent this risk.
Particularly in connection with plant protection products, the opinion is widespread that natural is good and chemicals are bad. But such a black and white outlook is factually wrong and ill-considered.
Synthetic production of natural identical substances
Many synthetic plant protection products are identical to nature. The possibility of producing active substances synthetically also has a positive effect on animal life and biodiversity. This is because it prevents useful substances from being taken directly from an animal. This applies, for example, to the important pheromones in organic farming. These are substances used to attract harmful insects. In a "natural" way, the active substance would have to be extracted from millions of butterflies.
The application is crucial
Even potentially dangerous plant protection products, whether produced synthetically or directly from nature, are safe for humans, animals and the environment when used correctly. Conversely, naturally occurring substances such as copper, popular in the organic farming industry, can be very harmful if used incorrectly. Copper accumulates in the soil and has a toxic effect on soil organisms such as earthworms. Copper can also have a negative effect on human health. Even untreated, "natural" foods can be dangerous. This is when they contain residues of the fungus toxin aflatoxin. This is considered to be highly carcinogenic. However, the use of suitable fungicides can prevent this risk. Another example is poisonous weeds that can be harvested with the main product. The use of herbicides such as glyphosate can prevent toxins from unwanted plants from contaminating the crop. The examples show: "Natural" can also be toxic.
Blindspot article
Ultimately, everything is chemistry
Chemistry is usually equated with the synthetic production of substances in the laboratory. But there are also people and much of what they do every day is chemistry, as this shortvideoclearly shows. Synthesis refers to the process of making a compound from elements or a new substance from compounds. Basically, this has nothing to do with poison at all. Natural substances can also be produced synthetically. The synthetic production of plant protection products offers many advantages and can also relieve the environment. Find out more here.
Related articles
Pesticides in Water: The sources are more varied and closer than we think
A new national study reveals that pesticide contamination in Swiss rivers and streams has more complex causes than previously assumed. While substances still originate from agriculture, a considerable share enters waterways through other pathways.
Biotechnology as a Tool for Nature Conservation
New genomic technologies can help save endangered species – from the chestnut tree to the northern white rhino.
The Poison and the Dose
The debate about threshold values for chemical residues in water and food is often shaped by misunderstandings and emotions. Few topics show as clearly how far perception and science can drift apart. But what do limit values really mean? In autumn 2025, the Agricultural Policy Podcast and swiss-food.ch will explore our relationship with limits and risk in a five-part series. The highlight will be a live podcast recording on November 5 at Bogen F in Zurich.
‘No genetic engineering’ is simply not an option!
For years, politicians and environmental organisations have been stirring up unnecessary fears about a technology that has been helping to conserve resources and protect the environment for decades, while improving the quality and tolerability of food and cosmetics. It is time to put an end to this consumer deception.