"Swiss water is in a bad way."
That's not actually true. Our surface waters, groundwater and drinking water are in very good condition. Our water quality tops international rankings. There cannot be any mention of poor Swiss water quality.
Saturday, November 2, 2019
In brief:
- Drinking water in Switzerland is of good quality.
- Water protection is a central priority topic in the Federal Council's national action plan on risk reduction and sustainable use of plant protection products.
- Agriculture, public authorities and industry are already working hard to continuously reduce unwanted entries. Research also makes an important contribution to making plant protection as targeted and sustainable as possible.
Water protection is rightly of great importance in Switzerland. The water quality is continuously monitored by means of a dense network of measuring points. The targets are extremely strict. Various authorities – including the Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office and the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment – consider drinking water quality to be very good in Switzerland. According to the 2019 NAQUA National groundwater Monitoring Report, only two percent of groundwater measuring points in Switzerland are above the extremely strict limit of 0.1 microgram per liter for plant protection products and their degradation products.
Limit does not say anything about risk
However, this limit value is not derived from toxicological studies. It was set when it was not possible to measure more accurately. Values above the limit do not pose a health risk. The following example illustrates how strict the limit values are: According to the European Food Safety Authority, for example, the maximum permissible daily dose of chlorothalonil is 0.015 milligram per kilogram of body weight. A person weighing 90 kilograms would have to drink 13,500 liters of water in one day to reach this level.
Many people have the impression that there are major problems with water quality. This is demonstrably wrong. Today's measuring instruments are so highly developed that they can detect a cube of sugar in Lake Constance. In many cases, only very small concentrations of pollutants, which are far below the already very strict limit values, are detected. In the headlines, these are already misinterpreted as a dangerous hazard.
Blindspot article
Sales of pesticides declining
The public perception that drinking water quality is decreasing due to the increasing use of plant protection products in agriculture is wrong. This is also confirmed by the latest sales statistics from the Federal Government. The total amount of pesticides sold has been declining for years. Sales of plant protection products with particular risk potential have also fallen. In conventional agriculture, sales have fallen by 35 percent in the last ten years.
The correct and professional use of plant protection products is crucial for the further improvement of water quality. Erosion and leaching must be avoided. The filling, emptying and cleaning of crop protection spraying equipment must also be carried out professionally. In this respect, the suppliers of plant protection products are also providing successful support.
High quality drinking water
Water protection in Switzerland is a great success. Lakes and rivers are clean and invite you to swim. Our groundwater is also doing very well. It is important that the quality of the Swiss groundwater continues to allow the production of sufficient, perfect drinking water without any problems. 40% of the groundwater used for drinking water supply can be fed into the pipeline network without treatment. For the remaining 60%, simple disinfection is sufficient. This is a world-class figure and unthinkable in many countries (including in Europe).
Related articles
Residues, thresholds, trust – looking calmly behind the headlines
In this conversation with toxicologist Lothar Aicher, the discussion focuses on how residues enter the body, how their potential harm is assessed, and what role modern analytical methods play.
Hazard is not the same as risk: how we understand – and should understand – threshold values
In this episode of the podcast, risk researcher Angela Bearth discusses residues and threshold values in food – a topic often debated emotionally. In public discussions, threshold values tend to dominate, while the complex challenges of agriculture are rarely considered. Studies show, however, that once these relationships are explained and solutions are addressed, people respond in a more differentiated way.
PFAS, trade-offs and responsibility – how politics and agriculture find solutions
In this episode of the joint series by Agrarpolitik – der Podcast and swiss-food.ch, National Councillor Christine Badertscher discusses how residues and threshold values are debated in Parliament.
Thresholds, approvals, responsibility – how plant protection products are really assessed
Threshold values are often at the centre of public debate – yet in reality they are only a small part of a much broader risk assessment system. Dr Michael Beer, Head of the Food and Nutrition Division at the Federal Food Safety Office, provides clarity.