Genome editing for animal welfare
British researchers were able to use genome editing to create single-sex litters in mice. In the future, the same technique could also be used to specifically breed only female chicks. This would prevent the killing of male chicks. But to do this, genome editing would also have to be permitted in animal breeding.
Wednesday, December 8, 2021
The "BauernZeitung" reports on genome editing in animal breeding. Researchers in Great Britain have succeeded in breeding mice either exclusively male or exclusively female. With the CRISPR/Cas gene scissors, they were able to deactivate a gene so that female or male embryos stop growing at a very early stage of development. In the future, the findings could also be used in the breeding of farm animals - for example in the breeding of laying hens. It is currently common practice to kill male chicks because they do not become laying hens. With the help of genetic scissors, chick-killing could soon be a thing of the past, as the sex of the chicks can be determined in advance. But it will take several years of intensive research before the process is ready for approval.
Dual-purpose chickens: More feed, less yield
At its assembly of delegates, Bio Suisse spoke out in favor of a ban on the killing of chicks as of 2026. At the same time, the so-called in-ovo technology for sex determination was also banned. The technology can be used to determine the sex of the chick in the hatching egg. In male embryos, incubation of the egg can then be stopped. With this decision, Bio Suisse is focusing on the dual-purpose chicken. Females become laying hens, the meat of males can be used. In terms of sustainability, however, the dual-purpose chicken fares poorly. Laying hens lay fewer eggs and the roosters put on less meat than modern broilers. In addition, dual-purpose chickens need more feed than high-performance chickens. The productivity of the chickens decreases when there is a greater need for feed.
Genome editing would actually be the ideal solution for Bio Suisse. Both the chick-killing and the sustainability problems of the dual-purpose chickens could thus be prevented. Treatment with genetically modified vaccines could also prevent animal suffering. But Bio Suisse firmly rejects genetic engineering. To the detriment of sustainability.
Sources
Genome editing for livestock farming
Genome editing can also be generally beneficial in animal breeding: With better genetics and more feeding efficiency, global warming can be significantly influenced. Furthermore, animals can be given resistance to viral diseases.Related articles
Residue is not the same as residue
Painkillers like Voltaren are a blessing for us – yet in our rivers they can harm fish. If these were crop protection products, calls for bans would be immediate. It becomes clear that we are applying double standards.
ARTE documentary: Genetic engineering in organic farming?
The ARTE documentary “Genetic engineering in organic farming?” examines key controversial questions of modern agriculture: Is the general exclusion of new breeding technologies still up to date? Can the resistance of organic farming be justified scientifically?
The Great Suffering of Farmers
Fire blight, Japanese beetles, or grapevine yellows – farmers in Valais, too, are increasingly feeling helpless in the face of the threats posed by nature. More and more often, they lack the means to effectively protect their crops. This makes it all the more important for the Federal Council to place a pragmatic balancing of interests at the forefront when setting threshold values.
'Tomatoes on your eyes'
The submitted “Food Protection Initiative” calls for “GMO-free food.” Leaving aside this illusory demand, its adoption would mean more bureaucracy, more trade barriers, and less innovation. The Swiss Farmers’ Union describes the proposal as “unnecessary” and warns of a setback to the goal of achieving an even more sustainable agriculture.