We are bringing up the rear in Europe when it comes to plant protection
Plant protection products that have been approved in the EU should also be authorised in Switzerland as quickly as possible, writes guest author David Brugger from the Swiss Farmers' Union.
Published: 23.01.2025, 08:53 | Updated: 12.08.2025, 10:48
They should be glowing yellow now – the rape fields. But instead of a rich yellow, there is a lot of green to be seen. The reason for this is the enormous infestation of the rape beetle. Despite two to three treatments with an insecticide, it can no longer be adequately controlled. To a large extent, the problem is homemade. In recent years, we in Switzerland have lost around a third of all active ingredients in plant protection products. Two-thirds of the insecticides used to control pests in oilseed rape have now been banned, without the authorities providing any effective alternatives. Seed dressing products have also been phased out.
The federal government realises that things can't go on like this.
One of the reasons for this is our completely gridlocked approval system for plant protection products. There are 770 products currently in the approval process, and the waiting time is also record-breaking. In some cases, it has been eight years already. After massive pressure, environmental organisations were granted a comprehensive right to a say in the matter a few years ago, the likes of which is not seen anywhere else in Europe. The consequences of this drastic remedy are now visible everywhere in the fields. There is a lack of solutions for combating wireworms, spotted wing drosophila and the cotton bollworm, which are destroying the harvests of entire cherry, bean and sweetcorn fields. But gaps in the use of herbicides are also causing problems. Problem grasses and weeds are continuing to spread. The federal government now realises that things cannot go on like this.
In an interim report on the implementation of the National Action Plan for Plant Protection, the Federal Office for Agriculture found that only two of the three main objectives were being achieved: protection of the environment and of humans. For the third objective, protection of crops, there was deterioration instead of improvement. The federal government is therefore proposing a revision of the Plant Protection Products Ordinance. However, the proposal does not in any way solve the urgent problems in practice. In principle, it only provides for an increase in the number of staff by 6 to 52 (!) full-time positions. The basic problem – the completely blocked and inefficient authorisation process – remains unsolved.
Damage to plant production in Switzerland
That is why we propose introducing the same procedure for plant protection as has been successfully practised for biocides for many years. In this area, Switzerland has always adopted the EU authorisation decisions – without anyone ever being upset about it or making unacceptable concessions to the environment. One third of all plant protection products are also authorised as biocides. If they are used as plant protection products, they are disadvantaged.
Until a few years ago, environmental organisations were full of praise for the EU authorisation process. Today, they want nothing more to do with it. Switzerland should ban everything immediately and without its own review if the EU does so. However, when new products come onto the market, they should continue to have to wait years for their authorisation in Switzerland. In the end, plant production in Switzerland will lose out – precisely the area that the authorities, parliament and environmental organisations would like to see promoted urgently.
David Brugger is head of plant production at the Swiss Farmers' Union. This article was first published in the «BauernZeitung» on 15 April 2024.
Kindly note:
We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.
We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.
Related articles
Full Shelves – Of course! How Secure Is Our Supply Really?
Security of supply sounds like a shared goal. However, as soon as it comes to the path to get there, conflicts arise: between market and state, ecology and production, as well as self-sufficiency and international connectivity. The Agricultural Policy Podcast and swiss-food.ch explore the key dependencies and areas of tension surrounding supply security in a five-part series. The highlight will be a live podcast in front of an audience on November 5, 2026, at the Äusserer Stand (Hofcafé) in Bern.
Record low potato harvest: Why is the Federal Council standing still?
The hot summer of 2026 caused the lowest potato harvest in Switzerland since records began a century ago. To secure domestic supply and build climate resilience, the agricultural sector is calling for swift access to new breeding technologies, which are already being authorized in the European Union. However, the Federal Council has delayed the corresponding draft legislation until 2027.
Food Security Initiative: Why Do the Goals Cancel Each Other Out?
The popular initiative "For a Secure Food Supply" calls for a self-sufficiency rate of 70 percent. At the same time, it demands drastic restrictions on crop protection and the promotion of open-pollinated seeds. The Federal Council also confirms that this balancing act does not work: a higher degree of self-sufficiency combined with severe restrictions on crop protection is not realistic.
Legionella, Japanese beetles, and market turbulences: What are the consequences of the dry heatwave summer 2026?
How do persistent heat and drought in the summer of 2026 impact health, agriculture, and the economy? The summer of 2026 exemplifies how heat and dry conditions are becoming a threat across various areas: from cooling systems and livestock housing to crops and consumer wallets.